Categories Uncategorized

Adult Star Warns Creators Over ‘Creepy’ New Trend on OnlyFans That Feels “So Wrong”

A top adult content creator has sounded the alarm over a chilling new trend sweeping OnlyFans—one that’s leaving many female performers feeling violated, uneasy, and downright targeted.

New Zealand’s biggest OnlyFans star, **Layla Kelly**, has revealed a sophisticated wave of catfish accounts disguising themselves as women to gain deeper access to creators’ intimate content—often using stolen images in the process. The revelations highlight how far predators are pushing digital boundaries. India Times broke the story, and **LADbible** echoed it for global audiences. LADbible reported that Kelly described the trend as a “creepy catfish craze” on OnlyFans.

Kelly explained that these men—not creators themselves—are using bona fide female identities (often a wife, girlfriend, or even stranger) without consent to trick performers into sharing photos or opening paywalls. Stolen wedding portraits paired with official IDs? It’s all being used to manipulate trust. “It’s so wrong,” Kelly said bluntly. JOE shared her warning, capturing her deep concern.

This tactic isn’t just annoying—it’s a full-scale violation. Using someone else’s face online without permission is identity theft and breaches OnlyFans’ terms of service, as well as laws in countries including New Zealand and Australia. Kelly warns it’s far from harmless. India Times confirmed that this trend is actively illegal.

Former adult performer turned marketing guru **Lucy Banks** offered insight into how the scam unfolds: men posing as women named “Mandy” or “Jess” claim they’re researching breast implants or medical kinks—anything to coax free intimate content. One notorious message: “I need to go for a pap smear, can you show me what that’s like inside?” It’s a tactic combining fetishistic language and false identity to trap creators. JOE reported this example.

Kelly said the trend is “a dime a dozen”—it’s not rare, it’s routine. She urges creators to demand proof, but scam impersonators never comply. And it’s not just stolen porn—it includes clothed images too, used to build a false persona. “One guy sent me a wedding photo and driving licence. Must’ve been his wife or sister. She had zero clue.” JOE again quoted her unflinchingly.

This isn’t fetish play—it’s predatory identity abuse. Kelly says she doesn’t mind fantasy or roleplay—but only when it’s consensual. Impersonation breaks that trust. “Consent matters, guys,” she admonished in an Instagram post, reminding users that it’s illegal and deeply wrong. India Times reported her call to creators and fans.

A viral tweet summed the horror for many performers:

“Men using wives’ nudes to catfish creators—is this kink or felony? Feeling sicked out.”

This trend also exposes vulnerabilities in platform safety. OnlyFans’ identity verification is aimed at preventing minors, but not impersonation. Kelly and Banks warn that we urgently need stronger checks—verified profile photos, ID screening, and red flags for suspicious patterns like identical birthdays or locations. JOE outlined these recommendations.

There are serious legal consequences at stake. In New Zealand and Australia, use of someone’s images without permission can lead to prosecution under identity-theft and revenge-porn statutes. In the U.S. and EU, similar laws are in motion. Advocates call for urgent enforcement. India Times confirmed these legal fronts.

Another tweet emphasized that boundary:

“If using real pics to catfish is ‘kink’, we’re in deep trouble. Consent’s not optional.”

OnlyFans has acknowledged the reports but offered only general assurances about community standards enforcement. Creators say that’s not enough. Kelly and Banks want transparent investigations, public takedowns, proactive screening, and real support for victims—because too many have already been hurt. LADbible calls for platform reform.

For fans this complicates the intimacy-feel of OnlyFans. How can you trust an online relationship when it might not even be real? Privacy experts warn that stolen image use fuels broader digital risk—deepfake attacks, blackmail, and psychological harm. Hindustan Times reported the ripple effect.

Creator support networks are now flagging catfish accounts aggressively—and urging users to watch for patterns: sudden location changes, inconsistent posting habits, or pressure for free content. Kelly leads the charge: “If my instinct kicks in even once, I block, report, and ask for ID verification.” JOE quoted her process.

This isn’t just an adult-industry issue—it resonates across all digital creator economies. Models, influencers, and streamers are vulnerable. The OnlyFans trend may be the tip of the iceberg. LADbible highlights its broader implications.

Now, top creators and advocates are calling for a formal coalition—platforms, law enforcement, and privacy NGOs working together to identify and prosecute catfish accounts. They want a “digital ID badge” for adult creators—publicly visible marks of trust. Governments are being pressured to recognize this as identity misuse, not kink. India Times covers that push.

For Kelly, it’s personal—and painful. She’s stopped taking messages unless accounts are verified. And she’s publicly urged her fans: “If something feels off, trust it.” Her warning isn’t sensational—it’s for survival. And it’s resonating. LADbible captured that sentiment.

Some creators have launched fundraisers to support victims of image-based abuse. Others offer free consulting on how to vet subscribers. One veteran performer launched a 24/7 chat line to help new creators spot red flags. JOE noted the community response.

Legal experts suggest victims file reports under cybercrime and identity-theft sections. Some cases have led to arrests. Kelly believes scandal plus enforcement will finally shift platform safety. HT confirmed legal actions.

Ultimately, Layla Kelly’s warning is a call to arms: OnlyFans and creators must protect trust before it collapses. Without action, this trend could turn intimate platforms into exploitation grounds. The message is clear: consent isn’t optional—and privacy isn’t negotiable.

LEAVE US A COMMENT

Comments

comments

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Elon Musk Fires Back After Trump Slams ‘Stupid Republicans’ for Believing Epstein ‘Hoax’

Elon Musk didn’t hold back when former President Trump recently lashed out at “some stupid…

Trump Makes Surprising Demand on Epstein Files After Alleged Birthday Letter He Sent Sex Offender Revealed

Donald Trump has shocked even his staunchest supporters by formally demanding the release of grand…

Death‑Row Grandmother in Bali Makes Chilling Final Request Amid Mercy Hopes

Bali’s notorious Kerobokan Prison—known for overcrowded cells and ocean breezes mixed with desperation—is now the…