The Department of Homeland Security has rejected claims circulating online that a Border Patrol commander was fired after federal agents were deployed to Minneapolis, saying the reports are inaccurate.
The controversy began after federal officers appeared in Minneapolis during a period of unrest, prompting sharp criticism from city officials who said they were not notified ahead of time. Local leaders questioned why federal agents were operating in the city and warned the move could escalate tensions, according to coverage from Reuters.
As backlash grew, reports spread suggesting the Border Patrol commander responsible for the deployment had been removed from his position. DHS responded by stating no firing or disciplinary action occurred and described the claims as false.
Federal officials said the agents were deployed to protect federal personnel and property, not to conduct immigration raids. DHS emphasized that the operation fell within existing legal authority, a position outlined in public statements available on the department’s website.
Minneapolis officials remained critical, arguing that the lack of coordination undermined local law enforcement efforts and public trust. The disagreement quickly drew national attention, with outlets such as NBC News reporting on the growing tension between federal agencies and city leadership.
The incident has renewed debate over how federal law enforcement should operate in major cities, especially during politically sensitive moments. Similar disputes in past years have raised questions about oversight, communication, and accountability, as noted in broader analysis from Politico.
DHS maintains that reports of a firing are incorrect and says the situation has been mischaracterized, while city officials continue to call for clearer rules and communication around future federal deployments.